Building Enterprise-Grade RAG Systems: A CTO Guide

As a CTO who has architected AI systems supporting millions of users, I've learned that Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) represents the sweet spot for enterprise AI integration. Unlike fine-tuning massive models or building everything from scratch, RAG systems offer the perfect balance of customization, control, and cost-effectiveness that enterprise leaders need.

In 2025, the question isn't whether to integrate AI into your enterprise systems—it's how to do it right. This guide shares the hard-won lessons from building production RAG systems that scale, perform, and deliver real business value.

Introduction: Why RAG is the Enterprise AI Sweet Spot

After implementing AI solutions across multiple organizations, I've found that RAG systems solve the three critical challenges that keep CTOs awake at night:

Data Control: Your proprietary knowledge stays within your infrastructure while still leveraging powerful language models. No more worrying about sensitive information being used to train external models.

Cost Predictability: Unlike fine-tuning approaches that require massive computational resources, RAG systems can scale incrementally with your data and usage patterns.

Rapid Implementation: You can have a working RAG system in weeks, not months, allowing for faster time-to-value and iterative improvement.

The enterprises I've worked with see average productivity gains of 30-40% when RAG systems are properly implemented across knowledge work functions. But getting there requires careful architectural planning and execution.

RAG Architecture Fundamentals for Production Systems

Building a production-ready RAG system is fundamentally different from creating a proof-of-concept. Here's the architecture pattern I've successfully deployed across multiple enterprises:

Core Components Architecture

interface RAGSystemArchitecture {
  ingestionPipeline: {
    documentProcessors: DocumentProcessor[];
    chunkingStrategy: ChunkingConfig;
    embeddingService: EmbeddingProvider;
    vectorStore: VectorDatabase;
  };
  retrievalEngine: {
    vectorSearch: SearchStrategy;
    reranking: RerankingModel;
    contextFiltering: FilteringRules;
  };
  generationLayer: {
    llmProvider: LLMProvider;
    promptTemplates: PromptTemplate[];
    responseValidation: ValidationRules;
  };
  orchestration: {
    queryRouter: QueryRouter;
    caching: CacheStrategy;
    monitoring: ObservabilityStack;
  };
}

Data Ingestion Pipeline

The ingestion pipeline is where most RAG systems fail in production. Here's the pattern that's proven reliable at scale:

class ProductionRAGIngestion:
    def __init__(self):
        self.chunk_size = 512  # Optimized for most use cases
        self.chunk_overlap = 50  # Prevents context loss
        self.batch_size = 100   # Memory-efficient processing
    
    async def process_document(self, document: Document):
        # Multi-stage processing for reliability
        chunks = await self.intelligent_chunking(document)
        embeddings = await self.batch_embed(chunks)
        metadata = self.extract_metadata(document, chunks)
        
        return await self.store_with_retry(
            chunks, embeddings, metadata
        )
    
    async def intelligent_chunking(self, document: Document):
        # Context-aware chunking based on document structure
        if document.type == "code":
            return self.chunk_by_functions(document)
        elif document.type == "legal":
            return self.chunk_by_sections(document)
        else:
            return self.semantic_chunking(document)

Query Processing Pipeline

The query processing pipeline handles the real-time user interactions:

class QueryProcessor {
  async processQuery(query: string, userId: string): Promise<RAGResponse> {
    // Multi-stage query processing
    const enrichedQuery = await this.queryEnrichment(query, userId);
    const retrievalResults = await this.hybridRetrieval(enrichedQuery);
    const contextualChunks = await this.rerank(retrievalResults, query);
    
    const response = await this.generateResponse({
      query: enrichedQuery,
      context: contextualChunks,
      userProfile: await this.getUserContext(userId)
    });
    
    // Critical for production: validation and safety
    return await this.validateAndFilter(response);
  }
  
  private async hybridRetrieval(query: EnrichedQuery): Promise<Chunk[]> {
    // Combine vector similarity with keyword search
    const [vectorResults, keywordResults] = await Promise.all([
      this.vectorSearch(query.embedding),
      this.keywordSearch(query.text)
    ]);
    
    return this.fuseResults(vectorResults, keywordResults);
  }
}

Security and Privacy Considerations for Enterprise RAG

Security isn't an afterthought in enterprise RAG systems—it's foundational. Here are the non-negotiable security patterns I implement:

Data Isolation and Access Control

interface SecurityLayer {
  dataClassification: {
    public: AccessLevel;
    internal: AccessLevel;
    confidential: AccessLevel;
    restricted: AccessLevel;
  };
  accessControl: {
    roleBasedAccess: RBAC;
    attributeBasedAccess: ABAC;
    contextualAccess: ContextualRules;
  };
  auditTrail: {
    queryLogging: AuditConfig;
    responseTracking: ResponseAudit;
    accessMonitoring: AccessAudit;
  };
}

Implementing Row-Level Security

One of the biggest challenges is ensuring users only access data they're authorized to see:

-- Vector database with row-level security
CREATE POLICY user_data_access ON vector_embeddings
  FOR SELECT
  TO application_role
  USING (
    user_id = current_setting('app.current_user_id')::uuid
    OR 
    department_id IN (
      SELECT department_id 
      FROM user_departments 
      WHERE user_id = current_setting('app.current_user_id')::uuid
    )
  );

Data Anonymization Pipeline

class DataAnonymizer:
    def __init__(self):
        self.pii_patterns = self.load_pii_patterns()
        self.anonymization_map = {}
    
    def anonymize_for_llm(self, text: str, user_context: UserContext):
        # Replace PII with tokens before sending to LLM
        anonymized_text = text
        pii_found = {}
        
        for pattern_name, pattern in self.pii_patterns.items():
            matches = pattern.findall(text)
            for match in matches:
                token = f"[{pattern_name}_{len(pii_found)}]"
                anonymized_text = anonymized_text.replace(match, token)
                pii_found[token] = match
        
        # Store mapping for de-anonymization
        self.anonymization_map[user_context.session_id] = pii_found
        return anonymized_text
    
    def deanonymize_response(self, response: str, session_id: str):
        # Restore PII in the response
        mapping = self.anonymization_map.get(session_id, {})
        for token, original_value in mapping.items():
            response = response.replace(token, original_value)
        return response

Vector Database Selection and Optimization Strategies

Choosing the right vector database is critical for performance and cost. Here's my decision framework:

Database Comparison Matrix

Database	Best For	Strengths	Limitations
Pinecone	Rapid prototyping	Managed service, easy scaling	Vendor lock-in, cost at scale
Weaviate	Hybrid search	Built-in ML, GraphQL API	Complex configuration
Qdrant	High performance	Rust performance, filtering	Newer ecosystem
pgvector	Existing PostgreSQL	Familiar tooling, ACID compliance	Limited scale

Optimization Strategies

class VectorOptimization:
    def __init__(self, vector_db):
        self.vector_db = vector_db
        self.optimization_config = self.load_optimization_config()
    
    async def optimize_for_workload(self, workload_pattern: WorkloadPattern):
        if workload_pattern.type == "high_throughput":
            await self.configure_for_throughput()
        elif workload_pattern.type == "low_latency":
            await self.configure_for_latency()
        elif workload_pattern.type == "cost_optimized":
            await self.configure_for_cost()
    
    async def configure_for_throughput(self):
        # Batch operations, async processing
        self.vector_db.configure({
            "batch_size": 1000,
            "parallel_workers": 16,
            "index_type": "HNSW",
            "ef_construction": 200
        })
    
    async def configure_for_latency(self):
        # Optimize for sub-100ms responses
        self.vector_db.configure({
            "cache_size": "8GB",
            "index_type": "FLAT",
            "preload_index": True,
            "connection_pool_size": 50
        })

LLM Integration Patterns: From OpenAI to Self-Hosted Models

The LLM integration strategy significantly impacts both cost and performance. Here's how I approach the decision:

Multi-Provider Architecture

interface LLMProvider {
  name: string;
  endpoint: string;
  costPerToken: number;
  latency: number;
  capabilities: ModelCapabilities;
}

class LLMRouter {
  private providers: LLMProvider[];
  
  async routeQuery(query: Query): Promise<LLMProvider> {
    // Route based on query complexity and requirements
    if (query.requiresReasoning) {
      return this.getProvider("gpt-4");
    } else if (query.requiresSpeed) {
      return this.getProvider("claude-instant");
    } else if (query.isPrivate) {
      return this.getProvider("self-hosted-llama");
    }
    
    return this.getCostOptimalProvider(query);
  }
  
  private getCostOptimalProvider(query: Query): LLMProvider {
    const estimatedTokens = this.estimateTokens(query);
    return this.providers.sort((a, b) => 
      (a.costPerToken * estimatedTokens) - (b.costPerToken * estimatedTokens)
    )[0];
  }
}

Self-Hosted Model Deployment

For enterprises with strict data requirements, self-hosted models are often necessary:

# Kubernetes deployment for self-hosted LLM
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: llama2-inference
spec:
  replicas: 3
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: llama2-inference
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: llama2-inference
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: llama2
        image: llama2-inference:latest
        resources:
          requests:
            memory: "16Gi"
            cpu: "4"
            nvidia.com/gpu: 1
          limits:
            memory: "32Gi"
            cpu: "8"
            nvidia.com/gpu: 1
        env:
        - name: MODEL_PATH
          value: "/models/llama2-13b"
        - name: MAX_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS
          value: "10"

Data Pipeline Architecture for RAG at Scale

Scaling RAG systems requires robust data pipelines that can handle millions of documents while maintaining consistency and performance.

Event-Driven Processing Architecture

class ScalableRAGPipeline:
    def __init__(self):
        self.event_bus = EventBus()
        self.processing_queue = Queue()
        self.dead_letter_queue = Queue()
        self.metrics = MetricsCollector()
    
    async def setup_pipeline(self):
        # Event-driven processing for scalability
        await self.event_bus.subscribe("document.uploaded", self.handle_document_upload)
        await self.event_bus.subscribe("document.updated", self.handle_document_update)
        await self.event_bus.subscribe("document.deleted", self.handle_document_deletion)
        
        # Start processing workers
        for i in range(self.config.worker_count):
            asyncio.create_task(self.process_worker(f"worker-{i}"))
    
    async def handle_document_upload(self, event: DocumentEvent):
        try:
            # Validate document
            if not await self.validate_document(event.document):
                await self.reject_document(event, "validation_failed")
                return
            
            # Queue for processing
            await self.processing_queue.put({
                "type": "process_document",
                "document": event.document,
                "retry_count": 0,
                "timestamp": datetime.utcnow()
            })
            
        except Exception as e:
            await self.handle_processing_error(event, e)
    
    async def process_worker(self, worker_id: str):
        while True:
            try:
                task = await self.processing_queue.get()
                await self.process_task(task, worker_id)
                self.metrics.increment("tasks_processed")
                
            except Exception as e:
                self.metrics.increment("tasks_failed")
                await self.handle_worker_error(task, e)

Incremental Updates and Consistency

class IncrementalUpdateManager:
    def __init__(self, vector_db, change_log):
        self.vector_db = vector_db
        self.change_log = change_log
        self.update_batch_size = 1000
    
    async def handle_document_update(self, document_id: str, new_content: str):
        # Track changes for consistency
        change_id = await self.change_log.start_change(document_id)
        
        try:
            # Remove old embeddings
            old_chunks = await self.vector_db.get_chunks_by_document(document_id)
            await self.vector_db.delete_chunks([chunk.id for chunk in old_chunks])
            
            # Process new content
            new_chunks = await self.process_document(new_content)
            await self.vector_db.insert_chunks(new_chunks)
            
            # Mark change as complete
            await self.change_log.complete_change(change_id)
            
        except Exception as e:
            # Rollback on failure
            await self.change_log.rollback_change(change_id)
            raise e

Performance Monitoring and Observability for AI Systems

Monitoring RAG systems requires specialized metrics beyond traditional application monitoring:

Key RAG Metrics

class RAGMetrics:
    def __init__(self):
        self.metrics_collector = MetricsCollector()
        self.alerting = AlertingSystem()
    
    def track_query_performance(self, query_id: str, metrics: dict):
        # Core performance metrics
        self.metrics_collector.histogram("rag.query.latency", metrics["total_latency"])
        self.metrics_collector.histogram("rag.retrieval.latency", metrics["retrieval_latency"])
        self.metrics_collector.histogram("rag.generation.latency", metrics["generation_latency"])
        
        # Quality metrics
        self.metrics_collector.gauge("rag.retrieval.relevance_score", metrics["relevance_score"])
        self.metrics_collector.gauge("rag.response.confidence", metrics["confidence_score"])
        
        # Cost metrics
        self.metrics_collector.counter("rag.tokens.input", metrics["input_tokens"])
        self.metrics_collector.counter("rag.tokens.output", metrics["output_tokens"])
        
        # Alert on anomalies
        if metrics["total_latency"] > self.config.latency_threshold:
            self.alerting.send_alert("high_latency", query_id, metrics)
    
    def track_system_health(self):
        # Vector database health
        vector_db_status = self.check_vector_db_health()
        self.metrics_collector.gauge("rag.vectordb.health", vector_db_status)
        
        # LLM provider health
        for provider in self.llm_providers:
            health = self.check_provider_health(provider)
            self.metrics_collector.gauge(f"rag.llm.{provider.name}.health", health)
        
        # Data freshness
        oldest_document = self.get_oldest_unprocessed_document()
        if oldest_document:
            age_hours = (datetime.utcnow() - oldest_document.created_at).total_seconds() / 3600
            self.metrics_collector.gauge("rag.data.staleness_hours", age_hours)

Distributed Tracing for RAG

from opentelemetry import trace

class RAGTracing:
    def __init__(self):
        self.tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
    
    async def traced_rag_query(self, query: str, user_id: str):
        with self.tracer.start_as_current_span("rag_query") as span:
            span.set_attribute("query.length", len(query))
            span.set_attribute("user.id", user_id)
            
            # Trace retrieval
            with self.tracer.start_as_current_span("retrieval") as retrieval_span:
                chunks = await self.retrieve_chunks(query)
                retrieval_span.set_attribute("chunks.count", len(chunks))
                retrieval_span.set_attribute("chunks.total_tokens", sum(c.token_count for c in chunks))
            
            # Trace generation
            with self.tracer.start_as_current_span("generation") as gen_span:
                response = await self.generate_response(query, chunks)
                gen_span.set_attribute("response.length", len(response))
                gen_span.set_attribute("llm.provider", self.current_provider.name)
            
            return response

Cost Optimization: Managing AI Infrastructure Expenses

AI costs can quickly spiral out of control without proper management. Here's my framework for cost optimization:

Cost Tracking and Attribution

class RAGCostTracker:
    def __init__(self):
        self.cost_db = CostDatabase()
        self.pricing_models = self.load_pricing_models()
    
    async def track_query_cost(self, query_id: str, execution_data: dict):
        costs = {
            "vector_search": self.calculate_vector_search_cost(execution_data),
            "llm_inference": self.calculate_llm_cost(execution_data),
            "compute": self.calculate_compute_cost(execution_data),
            "storage": self.calculate_storage_cost(execution_data)
        }
        
        total_cost = sum(costs.values())
        
        await self.cost_db.record_cost({
            "query_id": query_id,
            "user_id": execution_data["user_id"],
            "department": execution_data["department"],
            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow(),
            "cost_breakdown": costs,
            "total_cost": total_cost
        })
        
        # Alert on high-cost queries
        if total_cost > self.config.cost_alert_threshold:
            await self.send_cost_alert(query_id, total_cost, costs)
    
    def calculate_llm_cost(self, execution_data: dict) -> float:
        provider = execution_data["llm_provider"]
        input_tokens = execution_data["input_tokens"]
        output_tokens = execution_data["output_tokens"]
        
        pricing = self.pricing_models[provider]
        return (input_tokens * pricing["input_cost_per_token"] + 
                output_tokens * pricing["output_cost_per_token"])

Intelligent Caching Strategy

class RAGCacheManager:
    def __init__(self, redis_client):
        self.redis = redis_client
        self.cache_ttl = {
            "high_value": 3600,  # 1 hour for expensive queries
            "medium_value": 1800,  # 30 minutes
            "low_value": 300     # 5 minutes
        }
    
    async def get_cached_response(self, query: str, context_hash: str):
        cache_key = self.generate_cache_key(query, context_hash)
        cached = await self.redis.get(cache_key)
        
        if cached:
            self.metrics.increment("cache.hit")
            return json.loads(cached)
        
        self.metrics.increment("cache.miss")
        return None
    
    async def cache_response(self, query: str, context_hash: str, 
                           response: dict, estimated_cost: float):
        cache_key = self.generate_cache_key(query, context_hash)
        
        # Cache longer for expensive queries
        if estimated_cost > 0.10:
            ttl = self.cache_ttl["high_value"]
        elif estimated_cost > 0.01:
            ttl = self.cache_ttl["medium_value"]
        else:
            ttl = self.cache_ttl["low_value"]
        
        await self.redis.setex(
            cache_key, 
            ttl, 
            json.dumps(response, default=str)
        )
    
    def generate_cache_key(self, query: str, context_hash: str) -> str:
        query_hash = hashlib.md5(query.encode()).hexdigest()
        return f"rag:response:{query_hash}:{context_hash}"

Implementation Roadmap: From POC to Production

Here's the proven roadmap I use to take RAG systems from proof-of-concept to production:

Phase 1: MVP Development (4-6 weeks)

Week 1-2: Foundation

• Set up basic RAG architecture
• Implement document ingestion pipeline
• Choose and configure vector database
• Basic LLM integration

Week 3-4: Core Features

• Query processing pipeline
• Basic retrieval and generation
• Simple web interface
• Initial testing with sample data

Week 5-6: MVP Refinement

• Performance optimization
• Basic security measures
• User feedback integration
• Deployment to staging environment

Phase 2: Production Readiness (6-8 weeks)

class ProductionReadinessChecklist:
    def __init__(self):
        self.requirements = {
            "security": [
                "Authentication and authorization",
                "Data encryption at rest and in transit",
                "Audit logging",
                "PII handling and anonymization"
            ],
            "performance": [
                "Sub-500ms query response time",
                "Support for 1000+ concurrent users",
                "Horizontal scaling capability",
                "Caching implementation"
            ],
            "reliability": [
                "99.9% uptime SLA",
                "Automated failover",
                "Data backup and recovery",
                "Circuit breakers and retry logic"
            ],
            "observability": [
                "Comprehensive metrics collection",
                "Distributed tracing",
                "Alerting and monitoring",
                "Cost tracking"
            ]
        }
    
    def validate_production_readiness(self):
        for category, requirements in self.requirements.items():
            for requirement in requirements:
                if not self.check_requirement(requirement):
                    raise ProductionReadinessError(f"Missing: {requirement}")

Phase 3: Scale and Optimize (Ongoing)

Months 3-6: Scaling

• Multi-region deployment
• Advanced caching strategies
• Cost optimization
• Performance tuning

Months 6+: Advanced Features

• Multi-modal capabilities
• Advanced reasoning
• Custom model fine-tuning
• Integration with existing enterprise systems

Case Study: Scaling RAG to Support 1M+ Users

Let me share a real example from scaling a RAG system for a Fortune 500 client:

The Challenge

The client needed to provide AI-powered support across their knowledge base of 2M+ documents, serving 1M+ employees globally with sub-second response times.

Architecture Decisions

Multi-Region Vector Database Deployment

# Global vector database configuration
regions:
  us-east-1:
    primary: true
    vector_db_nodes: 5
    replica_count: 2
  eu-west-1:
    primary: false
    vector_db_nodes: 3
    replica_count: 2
  ap-southeast-1:
    primary: false
    vector_db_nodes: 3
    replica_count: 2

load_balancing:
  strategy: "geographic_proximity"
  failover_threshold: "500ms"
  health_check_interval: "30s"

Tiered Caching Strategy

class TieredCaching:
    def __init__(self):
        self.l1_cache = InMemoryCache(size="2GB")  # Hot queries
        self.l2_cache = RedisCache(size="50GB")    # Warm queries
        self.l3_cache = S3Cache()                  # Cold queries
    
    async def get_response(self, query_hash: str):
        # Check L1 (in-memory) first
        response = await self.l1_cache.get(query_hash)
        if response:
            return response
        
        # Check L2 (Redis) 
        response = await self.l2_cache.get(query_hash)
        if response:
            # Promote to L1
            await self.l1_cache.set(query_hash, response)
            return response
        
        # Check L3 (S3)
        response = await self.l3_cache.get(query_hash)
        if response:
            # Promote to L2
            await self.l2_cache.set(query_hash, response)
            return response
        
        return None

Results Achieved

• Response Time: Average 180ms (95th percentile under 500ms)
• Throughput: 50,000 queries per minute during peak hours
• Cost Reduction: 60% reduction in LLM costs through intelligent caching
• Accuracy: 92% user satisfaction with response quality
• Availability: 99.95% uptime across all regions

Future-Proofing Your RAG Architecture

The AI landscape evolves rapidly. Here's how to build systems that adapt:

Modular Architecture Pattern

interface RAGModule {
  name: string;
  version: string;
  dependencies: string[];
  interface: ModuleInterface;
}

class ModularRAGSystem {
  private modules: Map<string, RAGModule> = new Map();
  
  async upgradeModule(moduleName: string, newVersion: string): Promise<void> {
    // Hot-swappable modules for continuous improvement
    const currentModule = this.modules.get(moduleName);
    const newModule = await this.loadModule(moduleName, newVersion);
    
    // Validate compatibility
    if (!this.isCompatible(newModule, this.getDependentModules(moduleName))) {
      throw new Error(`Module ${moduleName} v${newVersion} is incompatible`);
    }
    
    // Gradual rollout
    await this.gradualRollout(currentModule, newModule);
    this.modules.set(moduleName, newModule);
  }
  
  private async gradualRollout(oldModule: RAGModule, newModule: RAGModule): Promise<void> {
    // A/B test with increasing traffic
    const rolloutStages = [0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0];
    
    for (const percentage of rolloutStages) {
      await this.setTrafficSplit(oldModule, newModule, percentage);
      await this.monitorPerformance(newModule, 300); // 5 minutes
      
      if (this.hasPerformanceRegression(newModule)) {
        await this.rollback(oldModule);
        throw new Error("Performance regression detected, rolling back");
      }
    }
  }
}

Emerging Technology Integration

class FutureProofRAG:
    def __init__(self):
        self.capability_registry = CapabilityRegistry()
        self.model_adapter = ModelAdapter()
    
    async def integrate_multimodal_capability(self):
        # Support for images, audio, video
        multimodal_processor = MultimodalProcessor([
            ImageProcessor(),
            AudioProcessor(), 
            VideoProcessor()
        ])
        
        await self.capability_registry.register(
            "multimodal", multimodal_processor
        )
    
    async def add_reasoning_capability(self):
        # Integration with reasoning models
        reasoning_engine = ReasoningEngine([
            ChainOfThoughtProcessor(),
            LogicalReasoningProcessor(),
            MathematicalReasoningProcessor()
        ])
        
        await self.capability_registry.register(
            "reasoning", reasoning_engine
        )
    
    async def enable_agent_workflows(self):
        # AI agent integration for complex workflows
        agent_orchestrator = AgentOrchestrator([
            ResearchAgent(),
            AnalysisAgent(),
            SummaryAgent()
        ])
        
        await self.capability_registry.register(
            "agents", agent_orchestrator
        )

Conclusion: Key Takeaways for Technical Leaders

Building enterprise-grade RAG systems requires more than just connecting an LLM to a vector database. Success depends on:

Architecture First: Design for scale, security, and maintainability from day one. The patterns I've shared here have been battle-tested across multiple enterprises and user scales.

Security by Design: Implement data isolation, access controls, and audit trails as core components, not afterthoughts. Your enterprise data is your most valuable asset—protect it accordingly.

Cost Management: Without proper cost controls, AI expenses can quickly become unsustainable. Implement tracking, caching, and optimization strategies from the beginning.

Observability is Critical: You can't manage what you can't measure. Comprehensive monitoring and alerting are essential for production RAG systems.

Plan for Evolution: The AI landscape changes rapidly. Build modular, adaptable systems that can incorporate new capabilities without complete rewrites.

The enterprises that successfully implement RAG systems see transformational improvements in productivity and decision-making speed. But success requires careful planning, proper architecture, and experienced technical leadership.

---

Ready to implement enterprise-grade RAG systems in your organization? At BeddaTech, we specialize in architecting and implementing production-ready AI solutions that scale. Our team has the experience to guide you from POC to production, avoiding common pitfalls and ensuring your RAG system delivers real business value.

Contact us today to discuss your AI integration strategy and learn how we can accelerate your RAG implementation timeline while ensuring enterprise-grade security and performance.